Mats Rosenkranz vs Nicolas Parizzia Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 06 Mar at 02:53 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Rosenkranz vs N. Parizzia

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win

SUI
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Rosenkranz 1 - 0 Parizzia
They have played 3 sets in total, with Mats Rosenkranz winning 2 and Nicolas Parizzia winning 1. The last match between Mats Rosenkranz and Nicolas Parizzia was at the M25 Trimbach, 06-03-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Carpet, with Mats Rosenkranz getting the victory 6-7(2) 7-6(3) 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Rosenkranz | 1 |
| Parizzia | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M25 Trimbach(03-06-25)
M. Rosenkranz vs N. Parizzia H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $4,755 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 51.74% (327-305) | Career Total W/L | 53.44% (171-149) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 9 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Rosenkranz vs N. Parizzia Match Preview:
In a comparative analysis of second serve performance over the last six months, Rosenkranz has secured 48.4% of points on their second serve, whereas Parizzia has obtained a slightly superior rate of 48.95%. Such statistics have a strong linkage with match outcome predictions, shedding light on relative player strengths.
Detailed return game statistics illustrate that Rosenkranz has claimed 46.1% of points from their opponent's second serve, opposed to Parizzia's 40.77%. Conversely, when focusing on first serve return efficacy, Parizzia stands out with 24.13% success compared to Rosenkranz’s 19.14%, underscoring differences in return capabilities.
Under pressure scenarios reveal that Rosenkranz has been able to save 58.48% of breakpoints, whereas Parizzia has managed a lesser proportion at 45.45%. This information is crucial for in-game prediction models, as breakpoint saves can greatly influence match dynamics.
Analyzing overall performance over the past year, Rosenkranz boasts a match-winning rate of 67.16% (W/L 45/22), positioning them ahead of Parizzia, who has achieved a winning percentage of 47.83% (W/L 11/12). This historical data provides insight into the players' competitive consistency.
Examining career surface preferences, Rosenkranz achieves optimal success on Grass with a 60% win rate (W/L 9/6). In contrast, their lowest success rate appears on Hard courts at 44% (W/L 54/68). Meanwhile, Parizzia excels on Clay with a win ratio of 56% (W/L 139/110), similarly struggling on Hard surfaces with just a 22% success rate (W/L 2/7).
When delving into player tier involvement, Rosenkranz has predominantly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K levels, capturing victories in 74.42% of matches (W/L 32/11). Parizzia, participating in the same category, holds a balanced record of 50% (W/L 11/11). Both statistics are indispensable when gauging experience relative to competition levels.
Regarding opponent quality, Rosenkranz has continuously faced competitors averaging a 418.88 rank over the past year, significantly contrasting Parizzia's opponents who averaged a ranking of 152.65, indicating varied exposure to high-level challenges.
In assessing deciding set performance, Rosenkranz has emerged victorious in 65% of such scenarios over the last year, outperforming Parizzia, who has succeeded in 50% of deciding sets. This distinction can pivotally influence real-time match forecasts.
In terms of breakpoint conversion, recent statistics reveal Rosenkranz’s conversion rate at 25.17%, marginally outperforming Parizzia's 25%. Such statistics offer strategic insights for live match betting tips when discerning potential breakpoint advantages.
Ultimately, synthesizing these performance metrics, Rosenkranz seems better poised to triumph in this impending match, given their superior match-winning record, breakpoint saves, and deciding set prowess. The comparison implies Rosenkranz may have an edge, notwithstanding Parizzia's competitive ground on first serve returns and opposition quality faced.
Mats Rosenkranz vs Nicolas Parizzia Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Rosenkranz vs N. Parizzia H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 19 | Games Won | 17 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 13 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:24:7 | Average Match Time | 1:24:7 |
| 65% (36/55) | 1st Serve % | 71% (46/65) |
| 83% (30/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 76% (35/46) |
| 79% (15/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 74% (14/19) |
| 0% (0/1) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 25% (16/65) | Return Points Win % | 18% (10/55) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Rosenkranz Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 7-6(4) 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-1 2-0 ret. | ||
SF | L | 7-6(3) 6-4 | ||
N. Parizzia Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 7-6(10) 7-6(7) | ||
Q2 | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(0) 6-3 | ||
QF | L | 6-3 7-6(8) | ||

M. Rosenkranz vs N. Parizzia Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51.74% (327/305) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.44% (171/149) |
| 50.62% (736/718) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.22% (376/344) |
| 50.85% (7201/6959) | Games Win/Loss | 51.51% (3626/3414) |
| 44.59% (66/82) | Hard Win/Loss | 30.77% (4/9) |
| 49.12% (112/116) | Clay Win/Loss | 55.56% (155/124) |
| 58.09% (140/101) | Indoor Hard W/L | 42.86% (12/16) |
| 60.00% (9/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.59 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 4054 | Aces Total | 807 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 2015 | Total Double Faults | 542 |
| 1:24:31 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 467.41 | Average Opponent Rank | 298.06 |
| 60% (22439/37328) | 1st Serve % | 63% (7760/12308) |
| 75% (16729/22439) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (5332/7760) |
| 48% (7168/14889) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (2325/4548) |
| 39% (1236/3190) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (387/966) |
| 37% (13970/37897) | Return Points Win % | 37% (4506/12317) |
| 16.67% (1/5) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 47.37% (90/100) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 54.13% (236/200) | Futures W/L | 53.94% (171/146) |
| 52% (320/621) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (166/314) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (116/238) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (42/94) |
| 56% (111/198) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (47/86) |
| 85% (318/270) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (168/146) |
| 15% (318/48) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (168/22) |
| 18% (313/57) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (152/24) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Eva Vedder vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

Shintaro Mochizuki vs Federico Arnaboldi Prediction – ATP Bergamo Challenger – 18th November 2025 Best Bets

Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
